- From: Paul Walsh, Segala <paulwalsh@segala.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:56:08 -0000
- To: "'Shadi Abou-Zahra'" <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
-----Original Message-----
From: Shadi Abou-Zahra [mailto:shadi@w3.org]
That is significantly different from what I have been
told at the MWBP face-to-face meeting on 3rd March,
namely that MWBP is currently not making any assumptions.
Anyway, this is not the right list for this discussion...
That's because I couldn't make the meeting Shadi, just kidding ;)
As you know, Segala is co-editor of the mobileOK document and it doesn't
mention EARL for conformance claims right now. We contribute to the ERT
group too, so we just need to decide on the use cases for each method!
The WCAG does need to discuss whether to use EARL or Content Labels for
conformance claims though. This is why I raise the question here.
Paul and Shadi take their conversation to a nice warm comfortable virtual
café to discuss the intimate capabilities of RDF :)
Received on Tuesday, 14 March 2006 14:56:17 UTC