- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:20:10 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Then, given the assumption excerpted following, how could we uniformly and objectively measure whether a technology is not "well" supported, or that implementations are not "complete" in "critical" ways? (NOTE: use of "well" or "critical" in this assumption seem somewhat subjective to me - do we have an unambiguous definition of what "critical" or "well" mean in this context)? Do we have an objective definition of even the "completeness" of an implementation in this context? Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST : >I would assume that if technologies are not well supported (e.g. >implementations are not complete) in critical ways - that the technology >should not be used in a baseline. We should also confirm this. > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:21:06 UTC