w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from October 2002 by author

a@w3.org

• dvd真的不錯 (Saturday, 12 October)

Aaron Swartz

• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Thursday, 10 October)

Brian McBride

• junk: limerick (Thursday, 31 October)
• agenda will be late (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Issuette for tomorrow's aggenda (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Ensuring consistency of terminology (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: prioritized list of 'issuettes' (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Thursday, 31 October)
• Ensuring consistency of terminology (Thursday, 31 October)
• prioritized list of 'issuettes' (Thursday, 31 October)
• Fwd: Re: Disjointness of value spaces (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: terminology: what's a data model (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT (Thursday, 31 October)
• thumbs up to publishing the syntax spec and concepts doc (Thursday, 31 October)
• Disjointness of value spaces (Thursday, 31 October)
• RE: Syntax WD - thumbs down (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Thursday, 31 October)
• Fwd: Your Ideas Sought for the Mar 2003 Technical Plenary (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: No more labeled nodes (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: RDF Core WDs document consistency items (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals (Wednesday, 30 October)
• and again with the doc this time... (Wednesday, 30 October)
• more comments on syntax (Wednesday, 30 October)
• call for agenda items (Wednesday, 30 October)
• this time with the attachment (Wednesday, 30 October)
• first comments on syntax doc (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: terminology: what's a data model (Wednesday, 30 October)
• terminology: what's a data model (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: comments on concepts doc (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: completed comments on concepts doc (Tuesday, 29 October)
• completed comments on concepts doc (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: comments on concepts doc (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: defining RDF graph syntax (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: WebOnt: Structured Datatypes (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• comments on concepts doc (Monday, 28 October)
• Convention for introducing new terms (Monday, 28 October)
• The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• RE: Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items (Friday, 25 October)
• RE: RDF concepts (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: RDF literals and datatypes (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: RDF concepts (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Typed literals (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: RDF concepts (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: RDF concepts (Friday, 25 October)
• Strawman Schedule (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 24 October)
• weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1) (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18 (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: datatype literals and lang codes (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: datatype literals and lang codes (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• datatype literals and lang codes (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18 (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: Minutes: telecon 11th October 2002 (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: draft question: option C (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: draft question: option C (Wednesday, 16 October)
• weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... (Wednesday, 16 October)
• rdf:datatype v xsi:type (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... (Wednesday, 16 October)
• RE: So now we have tidy literals... (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: TEST: C-urrent datatying (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: draft question: option C (Friday, 11 October)
• draft email voting form (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: Further analysis on straw poll results (Thursday, 10 October)
• Agenda for RDFCore telecon 2002-10-11 (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: Further analysis on straw poll results (Thursday, 10 October)
• draft question option F (Thursday, 10 October)
• draft question: option C (Thursday, 10 October)
• draft question: option B (Thursday, 10 October)
• Proxy at telecon (Thursday, 10 October)
• Further analysis on straw poll results (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: straw poll results summary (Thursday, 10 October)
• correction: straw poll results summary (Thursday, 10 October)
• straw poll results summary (Thursday, 10 October)
• An implementation of proposal F (Thursday, 10 October)
• straw poll etiquette (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: possible untidy route (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Tuesday, 8 October)
• [w3c-rdfcore-wg] <none> (Tuesday, 8 October)
• telecon action: decision procedure (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: RDF list semantics (Tuesday, 8 October)
• email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: action: ask webont for input: version 2 (Monday, 7 October)
• action: ask webont for input: version 2 (Monday, 7 October)
• action: ask webont for input (Saturday, 5 October)
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1) (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: Untyped literals/datatyping: another test case (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: clarify "inline literals" (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? (Tuesday, 1 October)

bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com

• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25 (Thursday, 24 October)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18 (Thursday, 17 October)
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-04 (Thursday, 3 October)

by way of

• Re: rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: RDF Core WDs document consistency items (Monday, 28 October)

Dan Brickley

• Re: agenda will be late (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• RE: Serialization (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: top-level Comment on lBase (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1) (Monday, 21 October)
• lbase status edit (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype vs. rdf:Datatype (Monday, 21 October)
• lbase status? (Tuesday, 8 October)
• friends don't let friends heavy breath on teleconferences (Friday, 4 October)

Dan Connolly

• Re: new Primer version for review (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: No more labeled nodes (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: terminology: what's a data model (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: defining RDF graph syntax (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: Non-namespaced prefixing text (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: Convention for introducing new terms (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Friday, 25 October)
• rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Strawman Schedule (Thursday, 24 October)
• concepts: social meaning of URIs isn't novel to RDF (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: "Creating Apps with Mozilla," with RDF chapter, online (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals text (Thursday, 17 October)
• n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: draft question: option C (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: URIs for datatypes (not qnames) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: draft question: option C (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Monday, 14 October)
• details of rdf:datatype? (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: draft question: option C (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: draft email voting form (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: An implementation of proposal F (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format (Friday, 4 October)
• a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) (Wednesday, 2 October)

Dave Beckett

• No more labeled nodes (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Syntax doc comments (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Syntax Doc (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: WebOnt: Structured Datatypes (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: WebOnt: Structured Datatypes (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: RDF/XML spec comment (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Non-namespaced prefixing text (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review (Monday, 28 October)
• RDF Core WDs document consistency items (Monday, 28 October)
• rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Friday, 25 October)
• RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review (Friday, 25 October)
• Typed literals (Friday, 25 October)
• rdfs:StringLiteral and rdfs:XMLLiteral (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Serialization (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Strawman Schedule (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment (Thursday, 24 October)
• N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: Case of language identifiers (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Time to reconsider namespace URIs? (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype vs. rdf:Datatype (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Saturday, 19 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: TEST: C-urrent datatying (Monday, 14 October)
• Regrets for 2002-10-18 telcon (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (fwd) (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: test case: is RDF/XML layered on XML? (Tuesday, 1 October)

Eric Miller

• Minutes from the 2002-10-04 rdfcore teleconference (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: action: ask webont for input: version 2 (Monday, 7 October)

Frank Manola

• new Primer version for review (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: agenda will be late (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Ensuring consistency of terminology (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Ensuring consistency of terminology (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: terminology: what's a data model (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: terminology: what's a data model (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: terminology: what's a data model (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Syntax Doc (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model - Review Copy (Saturday, 26 October)
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: RDF concepts (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: concepts: social meaning of URIs isn't novel to RDF (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: simple entailments for numerals (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Comment on the concepts document (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18 (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: Abstract syntax - graph or triples (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: Comment on the concepts document (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Comment on the concepts document (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: Minutes: telecon 11th October 2002 (Monday, 14 October)
• straw poll results recount/check (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: Further analysis on straw poll results (Thursday, 10 October)
• comment (sanitized) on straw poll results summary (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: straw poll results summary (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP (Wednesday, 2 October)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Ensuring consistency of terminology (Thursday, 31 October)
• Syntax spec, tentative thumbs up (Thursday, 31 October)
• Possible regrets for 2002-11-01 telecon (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Reworked sections on datatypes and literals (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: comments on concepts doc (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: terminology: what's a data model (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: comments on concepts doc (Tuesday, 29 October)
• RE: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Datatype definition compatibility with XMLschema (Monday, 28 October)
• RDF literals and datatypes (Friday, 25 October)
• 2002-10-25 revision of RDF concepts (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: RDF concepts (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25 (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25 (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: Case of language identifiers (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: simple entailments for numerals (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Time to reconsider namespace URIs? (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Comment on the concepts document (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Comment on the concepts document (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Time to reconsider namespace URIs? (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1) (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values (Monday, 21 October)
• Time to reconsider namespace URIs? (Monday, 21 October)
• Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1) (Monday, 21 October)
• RDF concepts document with revised abstract syntax (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18 (Thursday, 17 October)
• Datatyping in concepts document (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: draft question: option C (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: URIs for datatypes (not qnames) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: Comment on the concepts document (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: Comment on the concepts document (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Friday, 11 October)
• So now we have tidy literals... (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: possible untidy route (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Friday, 11 October)
• RDF concepts draft (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: Practical question about rdf:format (Monday, 7 October)
• RDF list semantics (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: Untyped literals/datatyping: another test case (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 1) (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Tuesday, 1 October)
• 2002-09-27 telecon minutes (revised) (Tuesday, 1 October)

info@netscape.com

• Netscape General Information (Thursday, 10 October)

Jan Grant

• Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18 (Friday, 18 October)

Janne Saarela

• Re: An implementation of proposal F (Saturday, 12 October)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Thursday, 31 October)
• RE: Syntax WD - thumbs down (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals (Thursday, 31 October)
• Syntax WD - thumbs down (Thursday, 31 October)
• RE: Syntax Doc (Thursday, 31 October)
• RE: Syntax Doc (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Syntax doc comments (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Syntax doc comments (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: terminology: what's a data model (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: comments on concepts doc (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: terminology: what's a data model (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Syntax doc comments (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Syntax doc comments (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: terminology: what's a data model (Tuesday, 29 October)
• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: completed comments on concepts doc (Tuesday, 29 October)
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: Syntax Doc (Tuesday, 29 October)
• RE: rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Syntax Doc (Tuesday, 29 October)
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: comments on concepts doc (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: defining RDF graph syntax (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: Datatype definition compatibility with XMLschema (Monday, 28 October)
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral vs xsd:string (Monday, 28 October)
• Regrets - 1st Nov (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model - Review Copy (Sunday, 27 October)
• RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model - Review Copy (Saturday, 26 October)
• xml:lang="" - empty or optional language IDs (Saturday, 26 October)
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Minutes 25 May (2001) for review (and: fun with RDF for meeting records) (Friday, 25 October)
• RE: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase (Friday, 25 October)
• RE: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase (Friday, 25 October)
• RE: Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items (Friday, 25 October)
• RE: Serialization (Friday, 25 October)
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral and rdfs:XMLLiteral (Friday, 25 October)
• RE: RDF literals and datatypes (Friday, 25 October)
• RE: RDF concepts (Friday, 25 October)
• Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items (Friday, 25 October)
• more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase (Friday, 25 October)
• RDF concepts (Friday, 25 October)
• Serialization (Friday, 25 October)
• FW: status of LBase (Thursday, 24 October)
• top-level Comment on lBase (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: Case of language identifiers (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: simple entailments for numerals (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Case of language identifiers (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Time to reconsider namespace URIs? (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Tuesday, 22 October)
• RE: datatype literal and lang (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18 (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: datatype literals and lang codes (Monday, 21 October)
• Typed literals: current status (Friday, 18 October)
• RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18 (Friday, 18 October)
• RE: Typed literals text (Thursday, 17 October)
• RE: details of rdf:datatype? (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: Typed literals text (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Typed literals text (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type (Wednesday, 16 October)
• URIs for datatypes (not qnames) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• RE: So now we have tidy literals... (Tuesday, 15 October)
• RE: Abstract syntax - graph or triples (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: Minutes: telecon 11th October 2002 (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Monday, 14 October)
• RE: details of rdf:datatype? (Monday, 14 October)
• Aaron's comment qualifying his vote (Monday, 14 October)
• Minutes: telecon 11th October 2002 (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: TEST: C-urrent datatying (Monday, 14 October)
• Abstract syntax - graph or triples (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: An implementation of proposal F (Thursday, 10 October)
• Worry about RDF list semantics (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format (Friday, 4 October)
• RE: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP (Wednesday, 2 October)
• RE: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP (Wednesday, 2 October)

Jonathan Borden

• WebOnt: Structured Datatypes (Tuesday, 29 October)

Jos De_Roo

• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals (Wednesday, 30 October)
• regrets [was: call for agenda items] (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral (Sunday, 27 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Saturday, 26 October)
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral (Friday, 25 October)
• Minutes of RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25 (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: RDF literals and datatypes (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: RDF concepts (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Semantics was RE: weekly call for agenda items (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: simple entailments for numerals (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Case of language identifiers (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: simple entailments for numerals (Wednesday, 23 October)
• simple entailments for numerals (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1) (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18 (Thursday, 17 October)
• RE: details of rdf:datatype? (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: Typed literals text (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: draft question: option C (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Monday, 14 October)
• TEST: C-urrent datatying (Saturday, 12 October)
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: Worry about RDF list semantics (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: incomplete entailments [Was: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals] (Thursday, 10 October)
• untidy nodes [Was: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals] (Thursday, 10 October)
• incomplete entailments [Was: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals] (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: RDF list semantics (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: action: ask webont for input (Saturday, 5 October)
• Re: a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: Untyped literals/datatyping: another test case (Tuesday, 1 October)

Michael H. Grove

• Re: An implementation of proposal F (Thursday, 10 October)

Mike Dean

• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: Time to reconsider namespace URIs? (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18 (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Wednesday, 9 October)

pat hayes

• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Friday, 1 November)
• Feedback request (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: SEM: 5.5 List semantics (Thursday, 31 October)
• incorporating datatypes into the MT (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: No more labeled nodes (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: No more labeled nodes (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: terminology: what's a data model (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Syntax Doc (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: more comments Re: top-level Comment on lBase (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: RDF Core WDs document consistency items (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral (Monday, 28 October)
• defining RDF graph syntax (Monday, 28 October)
• RDF/XML spec comment (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: RDF Core WG draft of RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) for review (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: The first sentence (Monday, 28 October)
• request for feedback on domain and range semantics. (Friday, 25 October)
• rdfs:StringLiteral (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Strawman Schedule (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: concepts: social meaning of URIs isn't novel to RDF (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: FW: status of LBase (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: top-level Comment on lBase (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: lbase status? (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: draft question: option C (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: lbase status? (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: RDF list semantics (Friday, 11 October)
• possible untidy route (Wednesday, 9 October)

Patrick Stickler

• Issuette for tomorrow's aggenda (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: prioritized list of 'issuettes' (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals (Thursday, 31 October)
• Rolling back on lang tags for literals (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Notes on updates to RDF Schema (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: incorporating datatypes into the MT (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Thursday, 31 October)
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Datatyping literals: question and test cases (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: Datatype definition compatibility with XMLschema (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: rdfs:XMLLiteral related syntax changes (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: WebOnt: Structured Datatypes (Tuesday, 29 October)
• RE: rdfs:StringLiteral vs xsd:string (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: Datatype definition compatibility with XMLschema (Monday, 28 October)
• rdfs:StringLiteral vs xsd:string (Monday, 28 October)
• Re: rdfs:StringLiteral (Sunday, 27 October)
• Re: RDF concepts (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: RDF concepts (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: RDF concepts (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-25 (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: weekly call for agenda items (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: N-Triples changes for datatype values, (possible) N3 alignment (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: simple entailments for numerals (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: simple entailments for numerals (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: simple entailments for numerals (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: simple entailments for numerals (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: "Creating Apps with Mozilla," with RDF chapter, online (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Draft minutes of the RDFCore telecon, 2002-10-18 (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: rdfs:Datatype vs. rdf:Datatype (Monday, 21 October)
• Updated version of datatyping code (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: datatype literals and lang codes (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• rdfs:Datatype vs. rdf:Datatype (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: Typed literals: current status (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: datatype literals and lang codes (Monday, 21 October)
• Example code for working with RDF Datatypes (incl. XSD, UAProf, MARS, etc.) (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: Typed literals text (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: Typed literals text (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: Typed literals text (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: rdf:datatype v xsi:type (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: So now we have tidy literals... (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: details of rdf:datatype? (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: incomplete entailments [Was: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals] (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: possible untidy route (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: action: ask webont for input: version 2 (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: action: ask webont for input: version 2 (Monday, 7 October)
• Practical question about rdf:format (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-04 (Friday, 4 October)
• Letting go and moving on... (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: Datatyping: new medium-range proposal from HP (Thursday, 3 October)

R.V.Guha

• Re: Comments/questions on lBase (ACTION 2002-10-18#1) (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: lbase status? (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Thursday, 10 October)

Sergey Melnik

• Re: completed comments on concepts doc (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: Proxy at telecon (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: email straw poll: literal semantics proposals (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2) (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision) (Tuesday, 1 October)

Susan Lesch

• Re: Convention for introducing new terms (Monday, 28 October)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values (Friday, 1 November)
• Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18] (Thursday, 31 October)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2002 23:29:35 UTC