At 13:11 28/10/2002 -0600, Aaron Swartz wrote: >>[[The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a language for representing >>information in the Web.]] > >I hate to nitpick, but this isn't really true. RDF isn't a language, it's >a framework. I knew raising this was a bad idea when I did it. Let me make the following points: 1) We have more important things to worry about than this, so lets not spend too much energy on it. 2) RDF is effectively defined by its abstract syntax and a model theory therefore it is a language, or close enough for an introductory sentence. 3) If we are into "my text is better than yours" and arguments over style, I don't think I've got the energy. I've suggested it would be good to have a common one sentence "RDF is ...". I've made a suggestion. Hopefully we can at least all agree its not a data model. If any editor feels that his text is sufficiently better that it justifies being different then just go ahead. BrianReceived on Monday, 28 October 2002 15:04:09 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:32 EDT