W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

RE: So now we have tidy literals...

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:20:08 +0200
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Cc: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "RDF core WG" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDCEGCCAAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


> Test case:
>
> 	<rdf:Description rdf:about="#something">
> 	  <p1>abc</p1>
> 	  <p2 rdf:datatype="&xsd;string">abc</p2>
> 	</rdf:Description>
>
> entails?
>
> 	<rdf:Description rdf:about="#something">
> 	  <p1 rdf:nodeID="X" />
> 	  <p2 rdf:nodeID="X" />
> 	</rdf:Description>
>
> (please add that to the test collection, Jeremy/Jan/et. al.)
>

Answer: no it does not.

It is a good question - and it demonstrates that langstrings and strings are
distinct types.

Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2002 06:20:22 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:26 EDT