W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-04

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:21:12 +0300
To: "ext bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: "RDF Core WG 7332#" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3m04Lr04L36d.nKMgg1Hw@mail.nokia.com>


Brian,

In conjunction with item 7 on the aggenda, I would like to put
a straw poll to the WG as follows:

	Though it might not be your preference, could
	you live with the issue of inlined literals being
	deferred to a future WG such that at this time
	the RDF MT would assign no interpretation to
	inlined literals nor license any entailments based
	on triples containing inlined literals? Answer yes
	if you can live with deferment, or no if you cannot
	live with deferment.

If there is not a notable number of 'no' responses, I would like
the WG to hold a formal vote whether to defer this issue.

Patrick

_____________Original message ____________
Subject:	Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-04
Sender:	ext bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date:		Fri,  4 Oct 2002 11:07:25 +0300


Time:
10:00:00 Fri Oct 04 2002 in America/New York

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Oct 04 2002 in Europe/London

Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore

1: Scribes
This weeks volunteer scribe is Eric Miller
Volunteer to scribe next week


2: Roll Call


3: Review Agenda


4: Next telecon 11th Oct 2002


5: Minutes of 2002-09-27 telecon

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0008.html


6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions

ACTION: 2002-09-27#1 bwm
summarize requirements into next iteration of datatyping rationale document

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0013.html



7: Semantics of untyped Literals - Decision Procedure


8: HP Proposal
Explaining the Medium Range Datatyping Idea


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0019.html


9: Literal Semantics:  Review Rationale Document
    


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0013.html


10: possible semantic bugs concerning domain and range
Jos has asked for this on the agenda

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0288.html


11: Proposed technical changes to RDFS model theory


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0169.html


12: Frank's new assertion text
2002-08-23#7  FrankM  Propose alternative text for the concepts and abstract
                 model document to rectify concerns with conflicting use of 
                 "assertion".


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0226.html
  http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/2002-08-05/Overview.htm#section-Social



------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 04:26:25 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:22 EDT