- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:25:38 +0200
- To: "Jeremy Carroll <jjc" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
[...] > The new stuff is in 3.2.3. > > The key philoshophical differences are: > > + are we doing *RDF* datatyping or *XSD* in RDF. > + is the normal RDF environment datatype aware or not > > As I see it, the WG preference is for RDF datatyping but not assuming any > awareness of any actial datatypes (hence a preference for lexical forms and > lang tags). > > The minority opinion is that we are primarily doing XSD, and the target > implementation knows them all. (Hence a preference for values, or > pseudo-values). the latter is what I would think, and indeed that's incomplete but workable (right now) > Another argument that came up on Sept 13 was not over-zealously discarding > user input. > > Concrete textual issues are: > > + lang tag - in or out I don't see what it brings for typed literals, so I would say out > + do we talk about the typed value here or only in the model theory refer to MT seems fine > + do we want to restrict to the canonical form in case of XSD, yes -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 06:26:14 UTC