W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 02 Oct 2002 07:54:19 -0500
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1033563259.14910.530.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 03:38, Brian McBride wrote:
[...]
> Other
> -----
> 
> OD01: an endorsement of the practice of using datatype properties, i.e. [ 
> xsdt:date "2002-09-23"]. (gravy, not a requirement)
> 
> I believe the WG agreed to drop datatype properties this time round,

pointer to record?

I don't recall agreeing to this; maybe I was asleep at the wheel.

I'm gonna have trouble with any decision that *conflicts* with
the use of, e.g. xsdt:date as an interpretation property.
I use it all the time.

> in the 
> interests of time and simplicity.  Its also a wash between the two approaches.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 08:54:03 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:21 EDT