[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com] > Again, KISS would say to leave them out. They are unnecessary. I see now that in the case of using qnames rather than URIs, as a nod to N3 as well as for the convenience of examples, having at least one delimiter is necessary if both lang and datatype are to follow the lexical form. Though still following KISS, the following appears to be sufficient to handle all variations/combinations without supporting/suggesting any shorthand interpretation of a ^^ delimiter: "foo" "foo"@en "foo"@en-UK "foo"xsd:string "foo"xsd:string@en "foo"xsd:string@en-UK "foo"<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string> "foo"<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>@en "foo"<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>@en-UK XML"<h1>foo</h1>" XML"<h1>foo</h1>"@en XML"<h1>foo</h1>"@en-UK XML"<h1>foo</h1>"xhtml:h1 XML"<h1>foo</h1>"xhtml:h1@en XML"<h1>foo</h1>"xhtml:h1@en-UK XML"<h1>foo</h1>"<http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml#h1> XML"<h1>foo</h1>"<http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml#h1>@en XML"<h1>foo</h1>"<http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml#h1>@en-UK PatrickReceived on Friday, 25 October 2002 03:41:12 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:30 EDT