W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:09:26 +0300
Message-ID: <01bd01c278fa$b3b054b0$c99316ac@NOE.Nokia.com>
To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "ext Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org>



[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com]


----- Original Message -----
From: "ext Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>; "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>; "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>;
<w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>; <w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org>
Sent: 21 October, 2002 14:57
Subject: Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]


>
>
> [...]
>
> > > > >
> > > > >   <a> <b> "foo"<dt1> .
> > > > >
> > > > > The latter is easier to parse.
> > > >
> > > > Oh! yeah verily.
> > >
> > >I was also wondering about that myself for similar reasons but didn't
> > >expect anyone else was worrying about such things, and wasn't going
> > >to propose it.
> > >
> > >+1 then
> >
> > I think that gives you enough of a mandate to do it that way in what you
> > write up.
>
> I understood DanC wanted something with a separator
> in between, e.g. <a> <b> "foo"^^<dt1>
> I then wonder where the possible langstring would
> fit, is it then "chat"-fr^^xsd:string or in N-Triples
> "chat"-fr^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string> ?

This is still going to be a single node, right? Even when
N3 processes it?

I'm not an N3 expert, but I'm presuming the above ^^ syntax
is not meant to force some kind of expansion into triples or
any other structure in terms of the abstract syntax, right?

Patrick
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 08:09:34 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:28 EDT