W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

RE: rdfs:StringLiteral vs xsd:string

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:37:27 +0100
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDCEIBCAAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>



> It occured to me that one likely (and I think accurate) reason why
> rdfs:StringLiteral and xsd:string are different is because the former
> only defines equality of values, not ordered comparisons as does 
> the latter. Just a thought...

order over natural lang strings is awkward cf Charmod.

Jeremy

Received on Monday, 28 October 2002 03:37:39 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Patrick Stickler: "Re: Datatype definition compatibility with XMLschema"
Previous message: Jeremy Carroll: "Regrets - 1st Nov"
In reply to: Patrick Stickler: "rdfs:StringLiteral vs xsd:string"
Next in thread: Patrick Stickler: "RE: rdfs:StringLiteral vs xsd:string"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:31 EDT