- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:43:06 -0600
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> >>>Daniel Krech said: > > Hi Dave, >> > >> ... If not, >> then why not define the productions with anyURI in them as follows: >> >> nodeElementURIs = rdf:Description | classURI | rdf:nil | anyURI >> except from the RDF namespace >> >> propertyElementURIs = rdf:li | propertyURI | anyURI except from >> the RDF namespace >> >> propertyAttributeURIs = anyURI except from the RDF namespace >> >> where: >> >> classURIs = SEQ | BAG | ALT | STATEMENT | PROPERTY | LIST >> >> propertyURIs = SUBJECT | PREDICATE | OBJECT | TYPE | VALUE | FIRST >> | REST | _n > > >I do like the classURIs & propertyURIs split and will consider this. >Particularly I like it if it matches the namespace split too in 5.1. Whoa!! Am I following this right? Do we now have a syntactic distinction between property URIs and Class URIs? If so, I protest strongly. There should be no such syntactic distinction in RDF. This will break RDFS. When was this decision taken?? Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Monday, 28 October 2002 16:43:17 UTC