I believe what we "officially" decided about item 12 was that it would be considered as a comment directed to the Concepts document (and hence to be considered by the Editors) rather than continuing to be an item of WG business. <semiSeriousThreat>If all we've decided is that its sell by date is passed, or some such administrivia, in order to ignore it, I'll be happy to provide a "fresh" version by raising it again.</semiSeriousThreat> --Frank Jeremy Carroll wrote: > snip > > Rest of agenda not reached, but: > Graham noted that agenda item 12 is passed it's sell by date. > > 10: possible semantic bugs concerning domain and range > 11: Proposed technical changes to RDFS model theory > 12: Frank's new assertion text -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-8752Received on Monday, 14 October 2002 11:23:19 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:25 EDT