W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:27:52 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021014082609.00aafa20@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>, "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 19:19 11/10/2002 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:

>Er, yes, I didn't think of that.
>
>Now that you mention it, I could imagine a short-ish Concepts section on 
>"entailment".
>
>I'll give it some thought.

Please be careful not to overlap with the primer.  The concepts doc is 
meant to be a short normative document.

Brian

Received on Monday, 14 October 2002 03:25:32 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Brian McBride: "Re: So now we have tidy literals..."
Previous message: Brian McBride: "Re: TEST: C-urrent datatying"
In reply to: Graham Klyne: "Re: On equivalence of tidy/untidy (was: Re: Reopening tidy/untidy decision)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:25 EDT