At 15:06 31/10/2002 -0500, Frank Manola wrote: >Brian-- > >Sounds great, Don't it just! >but I see this creating the potential for an awful lot of delay (e.g., for >the Primer, it looks like I have to wait until all the normative docs >figure out their terms, and resolve any inconsistencies, before I can even >know what *words* I can use!). Yup, I reckon the primer would be most affected. >Also, what do you do if you decide you need a term whose "natural home" >ought to be in another document, but they haven't defined it? Petition >the editor to invent it? Yup. "An awful lot of delay" is not good news. I proposed a kinda of idealistic view which I guess is where we'd like to be when we are done. What do you see as the most practical way to get there? BrianReceived on Thursday, 31 October 2002 15:19:58 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:36 EDT