>Peter has sent this message to webont, which suggests the need to show some >relationship between lBase and one of the SWELs. > >[[[ >Also, is there a mapping from any semantic web language (RDF, RDFS, OWL >Lite, abstract OWL, Fast OWL, Large OWL) into LBase? I would think that >it would be a good idea to have at least one such mapping before LBase gets >to be a W3C note. Fair point. The next version of the RDF MT document will have such a mapping and will be re-christened 'RDF semantics'. I put up a slide of such a mapping for (most of) OWL at the Bristol F2F., you can see it at http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/OWL2LBASE.html We could include all or some of this in the Lbase document if people feel it is useful. I also now feel that the document should refer more thoroughly to earlier work in 'axiomatic semantics', just on grounds of scholarliness and due form. I will put a few sentences in the doc if nobody objects. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayesReceived on Thursday, 24 October 2002 13:06:47 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:30 EDT