Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals

To remind folks, the URL I think is:

   http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-concepts/2002-10-25/rdf-concepts.html

Brian

At 16:42 30/10/2002 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote:
>Starting with Brian's comments, and then employing a lot of editorial 
>discretion, I've done a major rework on the sections about datatypes and 
>literals.
>
>The main goal of this rework was to progressively introduce the concepts, 
>so the datatypes section has been moved ahead of literals, and the 
>datatype examples have been split across the two sections.
>
>The rework is attached to this message.  It's not very long -- I'm posting 
>the two sections to solicit feedback from the group, and make sure I 
>haven't distorted the intent in any way.  (There's still an issue of 
>requiring a lexical representation for each value [1] outstanding, which I 
>haven't got round to addressing yet, so please don't flame me on that just 
>yet.)
>
>#g
>--
>
>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0396.html
>
>
>
>-------------------
>Graham Klyne
><GK@NineByNine.org>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 12:19:08 UTC