W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:57:03 +0200
To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF7C41863E.ED66CBD5-ONC1256C59.00407E40-C1256C59.0041A5C0@agfa.be>


[...]

> > > >
> > > >   <a> <b> "foo"<dt1> .
> > > >
> > > > The latter is easier to parse.
> > >
> > > Oh! yeah verily.
> >
> >I was also wondering about that myself for similar reasons but didn't
> >expect anyone else was worrying about such things, and wasn't going
> >to propose it.
> >
> >+1 then
>
> I think that gives you enough of a mandate to do it that way in what you
> write up.

I understood DanC wanted something with a separator
in between, e.g. <a> <b> "foo"^^<dt1>
I then wonder where the possible langstring would
fit, is it then "chat"-fr^^xsd:string or in N-Triples
"chat"-fr^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string> ?

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 07:59:00 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:28 EDT