[...] > > > > > > > > <a> <b> "foo"<dt1> . > > > > > > > > The latter is easier to parse. > > > > > > Oh! yeah verily. > > > >I was also wondering about that myself for similar reasons but didn't > >expect anyone else was worrying about such things, and wasn't going > >to propose it. > > > >+1 then > > I think that gives you enough of a mandate to do it that way in what you > write up. I understood DanC wanted something with a separator in between, e.g. <a> <b> "foo"^^<dt1> I then wonder where the possible langstring would fit, is it then "chat"-fr^^xsd:string or in N-Triples "chat"-fr^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string> ? -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 07:59:00 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:28 EDT