W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

rdfs:Datatype vs. rdf:Datatype

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:09:38 +0300
Message-ID: <00a501c278d9$3ddee790$c99316ac@NOE.Nokia.com>
To: "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>



Seeing as how datatyping is now a part of the RDF core
rather than a part of RDFS, should we change rdfs:Datatype
to rdf:Datatype?

Patrick

[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com]

Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 04:11:00 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Brian McBride: "Re: Typed literals: current status"
Previous message: Patrick Stickler: "Re: Typed literals: current status"
Next in thread: Dave Beckett: "Re: rdfs:Datatype vs. rdf:Datatype"
Maybe reply: Dave Beckett: "Re: rdfs:Datatype vs. rdf:Datatype"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:27 EDT