Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2)

On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 03:38, Brian McBride wrote:
[...]
> The formal definition of this question is whether, given the second of the 
> RDF fragments above, entails (implies) the following (expressed in n-triples):
> 
>    <jenny> foo:age   _:l .
>    <film>  foo:title _:l .

It occurs to me that this conjecture/conclusion can be expressed
in RDF/XML, now that we have rdf:nodeID.

You might include that in order to head off any "well, this isn't
observable from RDF/XML" diversions.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 08:51:50 UTC