At 05:15 PM 10/29/02 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: >At 16:15 29/10/2002 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote: > >[...] > >>Section 2, references to background material. Recalling the difficulties >>I had when originally learning about RDF, I think references to >>background information are really important. > >Why? Short answer: because it's information that I would have found very helpful when I was trying to understand about RDF. I'll spare you a long answer, and suggest a compromise: (a) I separate the citations into a separate section titled something like "background reading". (b) We coordinate with Frank to put that section into the Primer. >>Section 2.4.5: I think this section makes an important point. I can >>massage the words. > >What point? (a) there may be alternative serialization forms (b) RDF/XML is the (only) one that is standardized by this family of specifications #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 06:59:20 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:34 EDT