W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: details of rdf:datatype?

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:54:54 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021015115405.00a88420@127.0.0.1>
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

At 09:55 AM 10/15/02 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote:
> > My take is that only the first case is RDF-entailed:  if the datatype and
> > text are the same for two literals then they must denote the same value.
>
>But they are not the same datatype. They are different URIs, and RDF
>cannot know that there is any intersection of the value spaces of
>xsd:integer and xsd:decimal. Thus the first case is not RDF-entailed.

Oops, I missed that.  Yes, if the datatype URIs are different then IMHO RDF 
(alone) cannot infer an equivalence.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2002 09:21:59 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:26 EDT