Re: Typed literals: current status

At 15:16 21/10/2002 +0200, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

[...]

>Another thing, which negatively impacts DaveB, is that it then becomes
>clearer that some of the C14N stuff about XML Literals probably ends up in
>the syntax doc. I could try and work out what.

That sounds a bit worrying.  How large a change is this?  Is it really 
necessary?

Brian