W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Semantics of non-datatyped literals: Rationale (version 2)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 14:17:03 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021002141643.02c1ad00@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

At 07:52 02/10/2002 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 03:38, Brian McBride wrote:
>[...]
> > The formal definition of this question is whether, given the second of the
> > RDF fragments above, entails (implies) the following (expressed in 
> n-triples):
> >
> >    <jenny> foo:age   _:l .
> >    <film>  foo:title _:l .
>
>It occurs to me that this conjecture/conclusion can be expressed
>in RDF/XML, now that we have rdf:nodeID.
>
>You might include that in order to head off any "well, this isn't
>observable from RDF/XML" diversions.

Yes, I think you are right.  I was being lazy.

Brian



>--
>Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 09:20:02 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:21 EDT