W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Typed literals: current status

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:17:40 +0100
Message-ID: <3DB40C84.9080709@hpl.hp.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Brian McBride wrote:

> At 15:16 21/10/2002 +0200, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> [...]
>> Another thing, which negatively impacts DaveB, is that it then becomes
>> clearer that some of the C14N stuff about XML Literals probably ends 
>> up in
>> the syntax doc. I could try and work out what.
> That sounds a bit worrying.  How large a change is this?  Is it really 
> necessary?
> Brian

This isn't *new* text - just text we already have getting reparented - with 
all the necessary adoption papers etc.

The problem is already a point of unclarity I suspect in our current round 
of drafts.

It's to do with what triple gets emitted in Dave's doc for a 

Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 10:17:55 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:28 EDT