W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

[w3c-rdfcore-wg] <none>

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 15:14:49 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021008151352.02272420@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Thank you once again to the chairs and the webont WG for making time to 
help us with this issue.  I have attached a copy of the slides I used to 
this email.

Here is my summary of the results I noted:

A: 5 found this unacceptable - it breaks owl in that there can be multiple 
cardinality properties with different lexical forms e.g. "1" and "01".

B: 6 found this unacceptable for the same reason as in A

C: 2 found this unacceptable on the grounds they need long range 
datatyping, they do not want to have to
    explicitly annotate data with specific datatype information

D: 1 found this unacceptable for the same reason as C above. 5 strongly 
disliked it.

E: 1 found it unacceptable because of triple bloat. 4 strongly disliked it 
and 2 liked it.

F: Generally folks liked this one.

Brian 

Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2002 10:17:46 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:22 EDT