W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Ensuring consistency of terminology

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 21:05:14 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021031210149.03a1ea40@127.0.0.1>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>


>I propose:
>
>o each concept has a natural defining home, e.g. abstract syntax stuff in 
>concepts, schema stuff in ...
>
>o the editors of the 'natural home' for a concept or term get to define it.
>
>o other editors MUST refer to that definition and MAY quote all/part of it.
>
>o editors MUST NOT create their own definitions for terms or invent terms 
>whose natural home is in another document
>
>o editors are encouraged to add a glossary to their documents
>
>o we will create an internal WG document for style issues and keep a list 
>of common terms and their natural home there.

[...]

At 08:22 PM 10/31/02 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:
>"An awful lot of delay" is not good news.  I proposed a kinda of 
>idealistic view which I guess is where we'd like to be when we are 
>done.  What do you see as the most practical way to get there?

If we accept that's an ideal, maybe we push on as we are, except that 
anyone who spots a multiply defined term, or concepts named differently, 
brings it to the relevant editors' attention for resolution.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 16:05:21 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:36 EDT