W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

RE: rdfs:StringLiteral

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:17:21 -0600
Message-Id: <p05111b28b9e5d223e4a3@[]>
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>_____________Original message ____________
>Subject:	RE: rdfs:StringLiteral
>Sender:	ext Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
>Date:		Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:01:05 +0300
>thanks Patrick I misspoke.
>Should all datatypes be subclass of rdfs:Literal;
>	No. As that would mean that their value spaces
>	are proper subsets of rdfs:Literal

No, it doesn't mean that. Seems to me, at any rate. rdfs:Literal is 
the class of all literal values, not all literals. If it were all 
literals then nothing would be in it, since there is no way to name a 
literal in RDF and use that name in the subject position in a triple.

>and e.g. an integer
>	value is not itself a literal.
>	In reality, the rdfs:Literal class is IMO a bug as it reflects
>	a syntactic quality of an object, not it's semantics.

Its badly named, for sure.


IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 13:17:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:01 UTC