W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: terminology: what's a data model

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 30 Oct 2002 08:08:55 -0600
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1035986935.23979.9323.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 06:15, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> >does this mean you're
> >changing your title?
> 
> I am not doing anything to the doc this week.
> I was waiting to see what was said in the telecon (which I won't be
> attending ...)
> 
> I think given the scale of comments we've already seen on both docs we are
> reviewing this week we need to decide how much change we want before
> publication.
> 
> 
> I no longer believe that this round of WD will be consistent in their
> cross-referencing.
> 
> Overall I hope the WG can direct the editors as to the desired changes, and
> the editors make a good faith attempt to meet the easier ones in the
> timescale, and we just accept a certain amount of screw up as inevitable.

Yes, let's.

> I fear that all our docs may need considerable work before last call; and
> getting on with it seems good - even if it looks a mess from the outside.
> 
> Possibly we could stagger publication. e.g. concepts goes out first, with
> refs to previous drafts of everything, then syntax, with refs to new
> concepts and previous everything else, etc. I don't think its worth the
> effort. I prefer a status fo this document that says that our goal on this
> round was to present all the technical material, and we are aware that there
> are editorial inconsistencies both internal to each doc and cross-document.

Good idea.

> 
> Jeremy
> 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 09:08:37 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:34 EDT