At 11:53 AM 10/25/02 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: >The rdf:collection stuff was decided 31May >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002May/0159.html >but that record doesn't show the "there are no interesting >entailments around rdf:first/rest" comment that I thought >I made and I thought we agreed to. > >Jeremy remembers it that way, though... FWIW, that's how I remember it, too. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 09:55:07 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:33 EDT