W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Typed literals: current status

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:09:03 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 22:02 18/10/2002 +0200, Jeremy Carroll wrote:


>Two issues are:
>+ the dangling langtag is somewhat ugly (but as Pat pointed out that isn't
>much of an argument against Patrick's practical use cases)

Yes there is.  I don't believe use case was issue, that can be resolved 
with b-node constructions.  The issue is that Nokia already have code/data 
in this triple form and

   a) they dissented to having datatyped literals without lang identifiers

   b) WG members are sympathetic to Nokia's needs and are unwilling to rule 
their data illegal

Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 04:06:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:01 UTC