W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: a low-impact datatypes proposal: rdfs:format

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 04 Oct 2002 09:05:43 -0500
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1033740343.14910.1766.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 07:01, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> Dan
> 
> something that I haven't understood about your position is how it works with
> owl:cardinality.
> 
> As far as I can see, all the OWL semantics proposals (including your own)
> require access to the *integer* value of owl:cardinality.

Nope; in the semantics I proposed, it's a numeral.

> As far as I can
> see, your preferred solutions to rdf datatyping provided only a *numeral*
> not an *integer*.
> 
> Can you please help me understand your position better, and how you join up
> your thinking in these two areas.
> 
> Jeremy
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 10:05:24 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:22 EDT