W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: details of rdf:datatype?

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:03:26 +0200
To: "Dave Beckett <dave.beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF72DCF823.4F4CF1FB-ONC1256C55.002BFD3C-C1256C55.002C463E@agfa.be>


>> that's right Brian, it was an attempt which has to
>> be tested much better, but it also works for
>> e.g. _:x"+0010" btw (for the moment we just exlude
>> xsd:string in the "try numeral-to-number-to-canonical"
>> another shortcoming is that we have some value range
>> limitation for the xsd:long and xsd:unsignedLong
>> in our implementation in Java and C# but there
>> are possible solutions for that (i.e. be incomplete
>> there)
>
>That's not a proposed datatypes syntax.  I said in last telcon,
>it'll be <datatypeuri>"string" - no bnodeid.

I agree with that (I said btw to express that for later work)

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 04:04:00 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:27 EDT