- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:16:26 +0200
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "ext pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com] > >"foo"-"" is not an xsd:string. > > Oh, yuk. I would vastly prefer that the blank lang tag is not in the > denotation. This seems to be shooting ourselves in the foot; with > this system, it is *impossible* to write an xsd string as a literal. Er, what about "foo"^^xsd:string Looks like an xsd:string literal to me... If you mean that inlined literals (non-explicitly datatyped) would be interpreted to be xsd:string's, then that's not allowed anyway. I agree, though, that is very odd for the lang tag to participate in the L2V mapping. It's really a scoping issue, not a characteristic of the lexical representation. Patrick
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2002 02:16:30 UTC