W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: RDF Core WDs document consistency items

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:43:30 -0600
Message-Id: <p05111b1cb9e5bbf9b23b@[65.217.30.130]>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com

>Suggestions for things for consistency across the docs that the
>Series Editor - Brian -  might want to consider:
>
>1) The phrasing, order and titles of the documents at the start of
>    all the RDF specs, usually in the Introduction section (as Frank raised).
>
>    For example:
> 
>http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Introduction
>    which I seem to have in a random order; I can't recall how I
>    picked that one.   Or in the latest primer draft:
>      http://www.w3.org/2001/09/rdfprimer/rdf-primer-20021027.html#intro
>
>    We really need the new model theory doc title if it is changing
>
>    Pat: Is it something like RDF Formal Semantics: Model Theory ?

No, lets just make it "RDF Semantics", or "RDF Formal Semantics" if 
people prefer. I'll let Brian choose.

>
>    Maybe also consider if this list should be in all documents?
>
>
>2) The [RDF-SEMANTICS] reference labels to use
>
>    In particular I'm trying to use the new title
>    "RDF Vocabulary ..." [RDF-VOCABULARY] etc. rather than emphasis
>    the schema word.
>
>
>3) The acknowledgements section with respect to current/former WG members.
>
>    I offer my shorter version of the concepts doc section (last two
>    paragraphs):
>
> 
>http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Acknowledgments
>
>More trivially:
>
>4) Example code block styles
>
>    I think primer and syntax are mostly in alignment here since they
>    we use the same style.  I tend to give each one a label, link to
>    it and have files that can be clicked / downloaded / validated
>    particularly for complete examples.
>
>
>5) Figure colo(u)r schemes
>
>    If we cared, so that the nodes and arcs were similar.  However
>    Pat's pictures are so pretty, I don't want him to change them ;)
>
>    I had a comment that the black-on-red nodes I used was bad
>    contrast and a bit difficult to read, especially when printed.

Toning down the red to pinkish will probably fix that.

>    Maybe the black-on-green nodes also has this problem?
>
>Cheers
>
>Dave


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 11:44:03 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:34 EDT