- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:37:21 -0600
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>I was not expecting XML schema to be regarded as a SWEL, at least >not at the current state of play. Me neither. We had RDF/RDFS/OIL/DAML/OWL/??? in mind. Perhaps I should make this clearer. Pat > >#g >-- > >At 02:44 PM 10/25/02 +0200, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > >> > At 09:15 AM 10/25/02 +0200, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >>> >A quick reply to one of pat's questions and then a list of >>> review comments. >>> > >>> > > ?? Can you say why XML Schema is nonmonotonic?? >>> > >>> >default attributes in the syntax >>> >>> Is this at all meaningful? Absent some notion of entailment or >>> inference, >>> which I don't see in XML schema, I'm not sure what it means to be >>> monotonic. >> >>Perhaps not, but in that sense the lBase doc has then also excluded XML >>Schema from being a semantic web language, since (unless you buy some of >>pfps's contortions in Yin/Yang), it cannot be expressed as a logical >>language in the way that lBase requires. >> >>I think being less ambitious and more specific in scope is desirable. >> >>Jeremy > >------------------- >Graham Klyne ><GK@NineByNine.org> -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 12:37:56 UTC