W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:49:48 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021030194914.03bc4ec0@127.0.0.1>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

That would be the URL of the reviewed document.  The proposed changes were 
*attached* to my message [1].  The attachment is at [2].

#g
--

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0490.html
[2] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/att-0490/01-DatatypesAndLiterals.html

At 05:21 PM 10/30/02 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:
>To remind folks, the URL I think is:
>
>   http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-concepts/2002-10-25/rdf-concepts.html
>
>Brian
>
>At 16:42 30/10/2002 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote:
>>Starting with Brian's comments, and then employing a lot of editorial 
>>discretion, I've done a major rework on the sections about datatypes and 
>>literals.
>>
>>The main goal of this rework was to progressively introduce the concepts, 
>>so the datatypes section has been moved ahead of literals, and the 
>>datatype examples have been split across the two sections.
>>
>>The rework is attached to this message.  It's not very long -- I'm 
>>posting the two sections to solicit feedback from the group, and make 
>>sure I haven't distorted the intent in any way.  (There's still an issue 
>>of requiring a lexical representation for each value [1] outstanding, 
>>which I haven't got round to addressing yet, so please don't flame me on 
>>that just yet.)
>>
>>#g
>>--
>>
>>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0396.html
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------
>>Graham Klyne
>><GK@NineByNine.org>
>>
>-------------------
>Graham Klyne
><GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 15:08:24 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:35 EDT