W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: draft question: option C

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 07:55:50 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 20:38 16/10/2002 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:


>Well, perhaps it's not worth re-opening the issue at this
>point; we're clearly not going to make everybody happy with
>any datatypes design.
>But I couldn't let your "everybody thinks this is just fine"
>go unqualified.

Fair enough.

>I'm not sure I'm going to be able to get this design thru
>last call without objections from the folks I work with.

Have your colleagues considered how the lint program might be adapted to 
cope with some exceptions where classes and properties are not disjoint, 
e.g. don't issue the warning when its a datatype property?  Possible define 
a class of properties which are also classes and define datatype properties 
to be a subclass of that.

Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 03:09:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:01 UTC