- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:51:23 +0100
- To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Graham Klyne" <GK@NineByNine.org>, "RDF core WG" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Brian: > Jeremy, what did you intend? I try to pass the hot potato to Pat! (A more serious answer to Graham) > I also understand that, following DanC's requests, > > _:x ex:prop "foo" . > ex:prop rdfs:range xsd:string . > > will be satisfiable in conformance with xsd:string datatypeconstraints. No decision - the current drafts say NO. Concepts say a literal is a pair. Ntriples says "foo" goes to "foo"-"" Model theory says untyped literals are self-denoting. "foo"-"" is not an xsd:string. > > But, what about this: > > _:x ex:prop "http://example.org/" . > ex:prop rdfs:range xsd:anyURI . Similarly, currently this is a NO. > > #g > -- > > PS: in my subject line, I say "test cases", which these are strictly > not. They could be made so by the invention of a new test case. Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 10:51:32 UTC