- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:08:26 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > > > Your report is now of more historical interest :) in getting around > > the syntax without rdf:nodeID, but still worth citing for background > > to the issues. > > I still think the heuristic of avoiding unnecessary rdf:nodeID is a useful > one for readability ... Espcially while there are plenty of RDF parsers out there that don't yet understand it... Dan
Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 08:08:32 UTC