W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: details of rdf:datatype?

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:55:11 +0100
To: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <32477.1034841311@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

>>>Jos De_Roo said:
> that's right Brian, it was an attempt which has to
> be tested much better, but it also works for
> e.g. _:x"+0010" btw (for the moment we just exlude
> xsd:string in the "try numeral-to-number-to-canonical"
> another shortcoming is that we have some value range
> limitation for the xsd:long and xsd:unsignedLong
> in our implementation in Java and C# but there
> are possible solutions for that (i.e. be incomplete
> there)

That's not a proposed datatypes syntax.  I said in last telcon,
it'll be <datatypeuri>"string" - no bnodeid.

Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 03:55:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:01 UTC