- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:55:11 +0100
- To: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>>>Jos De_Roo said: > > > that's right Brian, it was an attempt which has to > be tested much better, but it also works for > e.g. _:x"+0010" btw (for the moment we just exlude > xsd:string in the "try numeral-to-number-to-canonical" > another shortcoming is that we have some value range > limitation for the xsd:long and xsd:unsignedLong > in our implementation in Java and C# but there > are possible solutions for that (i.e. be incomplete > there) That's not a proposed datatypes syntax. I said in last telcon, it'll be <datatypeuri>"string" - no bnodeid. Dave
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 03:55:48 UTC