W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Datatyping literals: question and test cases

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:12:22 -0600
Message-Id: <p05111b27b9e5d0667c36@[]>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>  >Did you not understand the request? or
>>did you disagree with it? Or is it
>>a matter of not having time to write
>>it that way?
>My negative response to the request was here:
>it echoes what I think you said, and gives a rationale for rejecting your
>suggestion. Looks like we need to spend more time on that one.

I don't find the reasons give all very convincing. In particular, 
arguments from formal elegance should only be used as tie-breakers. 
But the last one, about XML accidents, is a reasonable one.

I would suggest that we let the model theory merge the cases back 
together, by ignoring the lang tag for non-XML literals. It has no 
meaning outside XML in any case: the *strings* "chat"eng and "chat"fr 
are the same string. If we want to distinguish them, then we should 
call them 'words' and have a domain of words in the model theory for 
them to denote.


IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 13:12:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:01 UTC