Re: RDF literals and datatypes

[...]

> Let me put it as a test case.
>
> Does
>
>    <a> <b> "foo"@"lang1"^^dtype .
> entail
>    <a> <b> "foo"@"lang2"^^dtype .
>
> for all dtype except the two built in ones for M&S style literals?

I'm getting an answer of no (no proof found,
which is not the same as a nonconclusion)
although if dtype would be a builtin xsdtype
then in that case it would be yes
(even in the unintuitive case of
"chat"@en^^xsd:string being the same as
"chat"@fr^^xsd:string)

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/