- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 07:36:12 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > Politics: > Some of this seems to be an extension of arguments in WebOnt in another > forum. Or arguments from the RDF Interest Group (c/o www-rdf-logic)... They relate to all RDF-based Web language and protocol work. > This seems unfortuante, particularly since those arguments are being > resolved. I also dislike the use of phrases like: "quite intractable > problems" rather than a less extreme "difficult problems". > Given that this note is unlikely to be revised I see no reason why it can't be revised. In fact I would hope to see it revised, at least minimally, in the new year. > I am likely to abstain whatever the editors do - publication is useful to > move the debate forward, and is in charter; but I am unlikely to be > convinced that it is appropriate for the RDF Core WG to make a proposal like > this. I tried to word the 'status' section quite carefully, to explain why it is reasonable for such a document to be published via RDF Core. It may be that the tone of the rest of the document is less cautious than the SOTD section, but as a proposal and discussion document I'm quite happy with it. Dan
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2002 07:36:13 UTC