W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:21:07 +0100
To: "Graham Klyne <GK" <GK@NineByNine.org>
Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF91397145.110382E3-ONC1256C62.0069CA41-C1256C62.006A52CA@agfa.be>


> Starting with Brian's comments, and then employing a lot of editorial
> discretion, I've done a major rework on the sections about datatypes and
> literals.
>
> The main goal of this rework was to progressively introduce the concepts,

> so the datatypes section has been moved ahead of literals, and the
datatype
> examples have been split across the two sections.
>
> The rework is attached to this message.  It's not very long -- I'm
posting
> the two sections to solicit feedback from the group, and make sure I
> haven't distorted the intent in any way.  (There's still an issue of
> requiring a lexical representation for each value [1] outstanding, which
I
> haven't got round to addressing yet, so please don't flame me on that
just
> yet.)

good work Graham, I have no burning remarks

after all, maybe it's not a bad idea to have the
langId only for untyped literals and XMLLiterals ...

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2002 15:18:28 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:35 EDT