Re: Reworked sections on datatypes and literals

> Starting with Brian's comments, and then employing a lot of editorial
> discretion, I've done a major rework on the sections about datatypes and
> literals.
>
> The main goal of this rework was to progressively introduce the concepts,

> so the datatypes section has been moved ahead of literals, and the
datatype
> examples have been split across the two sections.
>
> The rework is attached to this message.  It's not very long -- I'm
posting
> the two sections to solicit feedback from the group, and make sure I
> haven't distorted the intent in any way.  (There's still an issue of
> requiring a lexical representation for each value [1] outstanding, which
I
> haven't got round to addressing yet, so please don't flame me on that
just
> yet.)

good work Graham, I have no burning remarks

after all, maybe it's not a bad idea to have the
langId only for untyped literals and XMLLiterals ...

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/