At 10:13 AM 10/25/02 +0300, Patrick Stickler wrote: >Is it really that much more effort to look for [a-zA-Z] or >even [^<] rather than '@' and '<' rather than '^^'. > >I can't help but suspect that there are specific plans for >assigning structural meaning to these delimiters in a similar >fashion to how '^' is now defined for N3. FWIW, I think the proposed syntax is just fine. If it has been chosen to fit in with future plans for N3 (and I don't know that it has), I really don't see a problem there. This is a data format that has been designed for expressing test cases, and one of the key tools for evaluating test cases is cwm, so I think a little deference in that direction is not at all inappropriate. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 05:02:05 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:30 EDT