W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: RDF/XML spec comment

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:29:39 +0000
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <31083.1035890979@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

>>>pat hayes said:
> --============_-1176279589==_ma============
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
> 1. section 2.1
> para 1 delete 'also'

> para 3
> "A graph can be considered a sequence of paths of the form Node, Arc, 
> Node, Arc, Node, Arc, ... which walk the entire graph."
> reads oddly to me: it suggests that all graphs must be a single 
> connected path. In fact, most graphs cannot be traversed in this way 
> (without backtracking, at any rate). Maybe if you said "....a 
> collection of paths.... which together cover the entire graph"   it 
> would read better.
> Minor point.

That's OK.  I kept rewording that sentence and never got it right,
gave up.  Thanks for the fix - "collection" and "cover" are better.

> On the whole, a *super* document. First time I have ever understood 
> what 'striped syntax' means.

Ha ha.


Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 06:30:45 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:33 EDT