Re: n-triples for datatype values [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-10-18]

At 11:29 19/10/2002 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:

[...]

> > >
> > >   <a> <b> "foo"<dt1> .
> > >
> > > The latter is easier to parse.
> >
> > Oh! yeah verily.
>
>I was also wondering about that myself for similar reasons but didn't
>expect anyone else was worrying about such things, and wasn't going
>to propose it.
>
>+1 then

I think that gives you enough of a mandate to do it that way in what you 
write up.

Brian