W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2002

Re: details of rdf:datatype?

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 16:57:39 +0200
To: "Dan Connolly <connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF86AD10CE.D249A74A-ONC1256C52.004E38DD-C1256C52.005230C0@agfa.be>


> I'm puzzling thru the details of the [6Sep] decision.
>
> It seems to specify that this holds:
>
>          :jenny :age <...#integer>"10".
> =>
>          :jenny :age <...#decimal>"10".
>
>
> since those two literals denote the same value.
>
> and this one holds:
>
>          :jenny :age <...#decimal>"010".
> =>
>          :jenny :age <...#decimal>"10".
>
> If somebody would please confirm, I'd appreciate it.

I'm convinced that above 2 cases must hold
it's a straightforward job for a parser to do your
"recognizing" for the primitive XML Schema datatypes
(at least that's our actual experience)

> But I don't see how this works for an open-ended set
> of datatypes. Does this hold?

open ended will be incomplete by necessity I would think

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Monday, 14 October 2002 10:58:17 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:25 EDT