Re: rdf:first/rest/nil/List: syntax-only at the RDF level from Dan Connolly on 2002-10-25 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from October 2002)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 25 Oct 2002 13:19:44 -0500
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1035569985.25017.628.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 12:30, Dave Beckett wrote:
[...]
> There is no way for those to be made into owl:List using this form of
> abbreviation, hence no way for OWL to have a convienent notation for
> what might be called OWL lists.

rdfs:range works for me; it's not syntactic sugar but
an inference. see the listlayer example again for details.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 14:19:34 UTC