On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 12:30, Dave Beckett wrote: [...] > There is no way for those to be made into owl:List using this form of > abbreviation, hence no way for OWL to have a convienent notation for > what might be called OWL lists. rdfs:range works for me; it's not syntactic sugar but an inference. see the listlayer example again for details. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Friday, 25 October 2002 14:19:34 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:52:31 EDT